![]() ![]() Thanks to deploying and using Zabbix, I have learned a lot of stuff around Zabbix as well. It is very clever, and it has definitely won me over as a tool. #Net monitor 64 bit full#With Nagios, if you really want the full functionality, you have to pay for it. I know what I'm doing, and I could do more if I had support from them, but what you can do with the tool is very good as compared to other tools that I've tried out in the past, such as Nagios. There is always room for improvement, but this has to be one of the better ones. I am not giving it ten because it's not perfect. I don't think any monitoring tool is absolutely a hundred percent perfect. ![]() In my current role and in three years, I've gone from demoing Zabbix, doing a proof of concept, and integrating it with a few things to the boss turning around and saying, "Right, make it production." I have to admit that everybody that has come into contact with it or I've presented it to has been very pleased with the results. It has been a very good fit. I really enjoy using Zabbix, and I feel it does what I need it to do. I would rate Zabbix a nine out of ten. I am pretty biased. It is not really a bad thing, but you can't do everything yourself, so try and get people on board. I should have got them involved a lot earlier and sooner. One of my drawbacks was that I waited a bit too long, and when I brought them on board, I had already built most of the environment myself. Try and pick some critical applications to look at and build the value in the product in the initial phase, and that usually gets people interested in the application and moving forward. Don't just try and deploy it on everything straight off the bat. It is very good for what I want it to do. I would recommend getting your Linux and databases teams involved very early on in the journey, and when you are deploying, make sure that you are targeting the more important applications in your portfolio. For instance, for Linux servers, you need to have pseudo access to get the necessary information to monitor and that's kind of a hassle. There are a lot of aspects where they give you base information, however, for other necessary gleams of information, you may need to have high-low. It would help to present information - rather than trying to get the highest level of administrative access to present minimal information. There should be a little bit more integration in some of the other tooling and utilizing the APIs of devices or tools could be a little bit better. It's very minimal at this point and getting more information would be pretty vital. We need to get a little bit more information from the thin clients or wireless LAN controllers than we already do. ![]() We're currently just trying to find other info or anybody else who's comparable in terms of other network monitoring solutions. So far, it's been pretty good, however, due to the whole solar flare thing that happened two years ago, a lot of cybersecurity and leadership's kind of looking to replace it with something else. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |